Source Review: Lunarpedia — FFC Cambridge Process
Summary
| Verdict | Count |
|---|---|
| Consistent | 3 |
| Different conclusion | 0 |
| Novel supporting | 2 |
| Merits investigation | 1 |
| Not relevant | 0 |
Claim 1 — Process chemistry
Quote: "The FFC Cambridge Process reduces oxides to their metal components by electrolysis in a bath of molten calcium chloride."
Verdict: Consistent (q3.c6)
Why: Standard chemistry; supports the metal-and-oxygen production claim.
Claim 2 — Metals produced
Quote: "The process can produce titanium, aluminum, silicon, iron, and chromium from lunar minerals like anorthite, ilmenite, and chromite."
Verdict: Consistent (q3.c6, q3.c9)
Why: Supports FFC as cleanest direct route to individual structural metals (Al, Ti) — my calc's q3.c6 framing.
Claim 3 — Per-tonne yields
Quote: "Anorthite: 460 kg oxygen, 193 kg aluminum, 201 kg silicon, 144 kg calcium. Ilmenite: 316 kg oxygen, 316 kg titanium, 368 kg iron."
Verdict: Novel supporting (q3.c11)
Why: These are specific stoichiometric numbers I did not derive in my calc. They're consistent with my regolith O mass fraction (q3.c1) and serve as a reality-check.
Note: yields apply to processed anorthite and ilmenite, not bulk highland or mare regolith. Bulk regolith → beneficiation step → FFC input. This was clarified in q3.c11 post-Codex audit.
Claim 4 — Chlorine as Earth-import bottleneck
Quote: "The only substance used which is not readily available on the Lunar surface is chlorine."
Verdict: Consistent (q3.c6)
Why: Direct support for the FFC-Cl-dependency framing. Names the structural limitation that distinguishes FFC from MRE for lunar economics.
Claim 5 — Salt recycling necessity
Quote: "Calcium chloride must be recycled through salt recovery methods (grinding/washing, reverse osmosis, distillation, melting, or vacuum heating)."
Verdict: Novel supporting
Why: Lists the specific salt-recycling pathways. This is the research direction that would close the lunar-FFC economic gap. Could spawn a tree node: "Is lunar-economic CaCl2 salt recycling solvable, and at what TRL?"
Claim 6 — Earth TRL (Metalysis)
Quote: "Metalysis have successfully scaled-up the FFC-Cambridge technology from research and development (R&D) scale Generation 1 cells, with a further three generations designed, commissioned, and in operation."
Verdict: Merits investigation
Why: Metalysis Gen 4 cells running for terrestrial Ti production implies TRL 7+ on Earth. The lunar-config TRL is much lower because of the chlorine question, but the underlying electrochemistry is mature. Tree node candidate: "What's the minimum chlorine inventory required for steady-state lunar FFC?"