Does building a base on the Moon increase the total mass throughput humanity can deliver to elsewhere in the solar system — and at cosmic scales (Tt/yr), what constraints bind first on each side?

← Sources · Report home
sdc-cadence-anchor-internal

Starship Launch Cadence Constraints: Hard Numbers for Scaling Models (workspace anchor)

Avi + Claude (workspace synthesis) 2026 report cited by: q1-earth-industrial-ceiling
file:///Users/aviparrack/Avi-Claude/Workshop/Space/sdc/starship-launch-cadence-constraints.md

Source review

Source Review: Workspace SDC Cadence Anchor (compiled 2026-03-25)

Verdict: Consistent Confidence: high (for compiled numbers); medium (as primary citation)

Internal compilation of primary sources. Its per-input scaling tables (LOX, methane, engines, pads, steel, ASU power) at 100 / 500 / 1,000 / 10,000 / 100,000 / 1,000,000 launches/yr are the same first-principles arithmetic q1's calc reproduces from scratch. Numbers match within OOM (SDC's 2,660 launches/yr LOX hard ceiling at Block-2 vs q1's 2,330 at Block-3; the 14% gap is the Block-2-vs-Block-3 propellant difference). Use as a roadmap to primary URLs, not as the primary citation itself — every number cited from SDC should be traceable to its underlying tier-S/C source (Mobius, EPA, Wikipedia, FAA, NASASpaceFlight, etc.). q1's claims cite SDC alongside primary sources where both are available; SDC is the secondary anchor.

Extract

Abstract

The SDC project's internal compilation aggregates and cross-references the primary industrial-input constraints for Starship-cadence scaling. As a workspace-internal source it is treated tier-C: a synthesis layer over primary tier-S/A/C citations, useful as a starting roadmap but not citable as primary evidence. Its key compiled figures are: per-stack propellant ~4,900 t (3,870 t LOX + 1,030 t LCH4; Block 2 baseline); total US O2 production ~10.3 Mt/yr (per EPA); LOX constraint thresholds at 100 / 500 / 1,000 / 1,200 / 10,000 launches/yr giving fractions 3.8% / 18.8% / 37.5% / 44.9% / 375% of US O2 production; Linde Starbase ASU at ~2,000 t/d ($100M); current Raptor production ~1/day; FAA-approved Boca Chica cadence 25 launches/yr (as of May 2025 FONSI). Each compiled number is keyed to a public primary URL in the SDC doc's source list.

Key claims

  • starship-block2-propellant: "Block 2 ~4,900 t propellant per stack (3,870 t LOX + 1,030 t LCH4)" — per SDC compilation, citing Wikipedia + Mobius.
  • lox-binding-thresholds: At 2,660 launches/yr Starship LOX demand equals current US O2 production; soft ceiling ~130-270 launches/yr from existing supply before causing industrial disruption (5-10% of US output).
  • linde-starbase-asu: "SpaceX's own on-site ASU at Starbase: approved July 2025, reportedly capable of 2,000 t LOX/day" — adds ~189 launches/yr of capacity.
  • asu-capex-scaling: "3,000 t/d ASUs at ~$125M each, ~365 operating days/year, ~300 kWh/t average" — derived per-launch costs and power demand.
  • raptor-production-2025: "Raptor 3 engines observed up to serial number 68 by November 2025, with regular truckloads of 3-4 engines leaving McGregor test site" — current production ~1/day, target 2-4/day.
  • starship-pads-planned: ~5 pads by 2027 (Pad A + Pad B Starbase; LC-39A KSC; SLC-37 Cape Canaveral two pads).
  • faa-boca-chica-25: "Boca Chica approved for 25 launches/year (up from 5), as of May 2025 FONSI."
  • stainless-steel-anchor: At 10,000 new stacks/yr, steel demand is 3 Mt = 143% of US stainless production; for reusable fleet (500 vehicles × 20 flights = 10,000 launches), steel need is ~150 kt one-time, not binding.

Reviewer notes

This is our own workspace synthesis. Use only as a roadmap to primary URLs and as cross-reference for derived numbers. Do not cite SDC compilation as primary evidence — instead cite its underlying URLs (Mobius, EPA, Wikipedia, FAA FONSI, NASASpaceFlight, etc.) from their own extract.md files where they are fetched separately. The summary's "single most important number" — ~2,660 Starship launches/yr is the hard LOX ceiling at current US O2 capacity — should be re-derived in the calc sub-pass first-principles, not borrowed.